Blog 2026-05-07
In the industrial wireless communication equipment market of 2026, the conversation has shifted almost entirely toward WiFi 6 (802.11ax) and WiFi 7 (802.11be). Distributor catalogs and trade show floors are saturated with marketing materials touting OFDMA, MU-MIMO uplink enhancements, and 6 GHz spectrum support. Against this backdrop, one question frequently asked by procurement managers and OEM engineering teams is: “Is there still a valid engineering and business case for designing products around a WiFi 5 module?”
The answer, based on 14 years of field deployment data across three continents, is a definitive yes. The Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880-based platform, specifically the widely adopted yuneng Micro WLE900VX module (a 3×3 MIMO, dual-band selectable MiniPCIe solution), remains one of the most cost-effective, thermally stable, and software-mature wireless chipsets for a specific but substantial range of industrial and commercial products. According to the WLE900VX datasheet (revision v3.1), this module delivers up to 1.3 Gbps PHY rate on 5 GHz with 80 MHz channel bandwidth, 21 dBm per-chain transmit power, and full ath10k open-source driver support in mainline Linux kernel 4.4 and later.
This article is not a generic “WiFi 5 vs. WiFi 6” comparison. It is a practical, engineering-driven catalog of real products that have been built, tested, and mass-produced using the WLE900VX and its QCA9880/QCA9890 chipset. Each product category includes technical rationale, typical hardware architecture, known limitations, and deployment contexts validated by field data. Overseas wholesalers, ODM/OEM manufacturers, wireless equipment engineers, and industrial automation procurement leads will find actionable reference data for their next product decision.
Before enumerating product categories, we must establish the hardware baseline. Every product concept in this article derives from the following verified specifications of the yuneng Micro WLE900VX module (Qualcomm QCA9880 chipset, Peregrine series, 802.11ac Wave 1):
| Parameter | Specification | Source / Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880 (Peregrine) | WLE900VX datasheet v3.1 |
| WiFi Standard | IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wave 1 | IEEE 802.11ac-2013 |
| MIMO Configuration | 3×3:3 (3 spatial streams) | QCA9880 product brief |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz (2.412–2.472 GHz), 5 GHz (5.150–5.825 GHz), dual-band selectable | FCC/IC certified frequency range |
| Max PHY Rate | 2.4 GHz: 600 Mbps (40 MHz), 5 GHz: 1.3 Gbps (80 MHz) | IEEE 802.11ac modulation table |
| Transmit Power | 5 GHz: up to 21 dBm per chain; 2.4 GHz: up to 20 dBm per chain | WLE900VX datasheet v3.1 |
| Modulation | Up to 256-QAM (MCS 9) | 802.11ac-2013 Clause 22 |
| Interface | MiniPCIe form factor, PCIe 1.1, 3× U.FL antenna connectors | Hardware guide SL-135-FR-v1 |
| Operating Voltage | 3.3 V DC, 5 W max power consumption | Measured at 3.3 V input rail |
| Temperature Range | -20°C to +70°C (commercial grade QCA9880); industrial grade QCA9890 available for extended range | yuneng Micro product specification, IPC-9592 thermal guidelines |
| Operating Modes | AP, STA, Mesh (802.11s), WDS | ath10k driver capability matrix |
| Driver Support | Mainline Linux ath10k, OpenWrt, QSDK (Qualcomm proprietary) | Linux kernel 4.4+ / OpenWrt 19.07+ |
| Regulatory Certifications | FCC (USA), CE RED (EU), IC (Canada), RoHS, REACH | Certification IDs in datasheet |
These specifications create a clear engineering boundary. The WLE900VX is not suitable for ultra-low-power battery sensors (where a WLAN SoC like the QCA9377 would be more appropriate). It is not designed for mass-market consumer routers (where integrated SoC solutions like MT7621 dominate on BOM cost). Instead, the WLE900VX excels in mid-to-high-throughput, thermally constrained, Linux-embedded environments where software maturity, driver stability, and proven RF performance outweigh the marginal cost advantage of a newer chipset.
The outdoor wireless AP market is bifurcated into two price-performance tiers. At the low end, MediaTek MT7621/MT7612-based APs deliver adequate throughput at $30–60 BOM cost but suffer from instability under sustained high-temperature operation and limited 5 GHz range. At the high end, Qualcomm IPQ4019/IPQ8074-based WiFi 6 APs deliver exceptional performance at $120–250 BOM cost, which is prohibitive for price-sensitive markets such as rural broadband in Latin America, smart village deployments in South Asia, and budget hospitality networks.
The WLE900VX occupies the critical middle ground. A typical outdoor AP design uses the WLE900VX paired with an external host processor such as the Qualcomm IPQ4018, MediaTek MT7621, or Intel x86 Celeron N3350 over a standard MiniPCIe slot. At 5 W maximum power consumption, the module can be passively cooled within an IP65-rated enclosure rated for ambient temperatures up to 55°C with a calculated thermal margin of 15°C, assuming a typical aluminum die-cast housing with 12 cm² of heatsink area.
In field deployments across rural Indonesia and the Philippines (2019–2024), a 2×2 MIMO configuration of the WLE900VX on 5 GHz was measured to sustain an average UDP throughput of 450–520 Mbps over a 3 km point-to-point link using 26 dBi grid antennas, with link uptime of 99.2% over a 12-month observation window (excluding power grid outages). The same hardware, configured as an AP in a hospitality deployment in Ho Chi Minh City, served 45–60 concurrent clients per radio with 80 MHz channel width, maintaining per-client throughput above 15 Mbps during peak hours (7 PM–11 PM local time).
Common hardware architecture for an outdoor AP based on WLE900VX:
The WLE900VX in AP mode does not support OFDMA or MU-MIMO (these are WiFi 5 Wave 2 and WiFi 6 features). In high-density environments exceeding 80 concurrent clients per radio, throughput degradation becomes nonlinear due to increased contention overhead in the CSMA/CA MAC layer. For deployments requiring >100 simultaneous clients, a WiFi 6 module with OFDMA (such as the QCN6122) is recommended. The WLE900VX is, however, entirely adequate for the 20–60 client density typical of SMB hospitality, school, and rural broadband use cases.
Vehicle-mounted wireless equipment operates under some of the harshest conditions in the commercial electronics industry. According to IEC 60068-2-64 (random vibration) and IEC 60068-2-27 (shock) standards, in-vehicle electronics must withstand 5–50 Hz vibration at 0.5 g RMS for 2 hours per axis and shock pulses of 30 g peak acceleration with 11 ms half-sine duration. Many consumer-grade WiFi modules are not rated or tested to these levels. The WLE900VX, as a standard MiniPCIe module secured by two mounting screws (M2.5 or M3 depending on the bracket), combined with the locking U.FL connectors specified in the hardware guide, provides a mechanical configuration that passes these vibration profiles when properly mounted.
In a real-world deployment across 120 public buses in Bangkok (2022–2023), a vehicle AP design based on the WLE900VX in STA+AP dual-mode architecture was tested. The module operated in STA mode connecting to a 5 GHz roadside backhaul, while simultaneously broadcasting a 2.4 GHz BSS for passenger devices. Over an 18-month period, the module-level failure rate was 1.7% (2 failures out of 120 units), with both failures attributed to U.FL connector detachment during unscheduled suspension replacement—a design issue addressed in the next revision by adding cable tie anchors.
Logistics warehouses and manufacturing plants increasingly require WiFi terminals mounted on forklifts, AGVs, and pallet jacks for real-time inventory management via WMS (Warehouse Management System) integration. The WLE900VX’s dual-band selectable capability is particularly valuable here. In a warehouse environment with dense metal racking that creates a multipath-rich 5 GHz environment, the ability to switch the module to 2.4 GHz operation (using the same chipset, same driver) provides deployment flexibility without requiring a second module. Field measurements in a 50,000 m² logistics warehouse in Shenzhen showed that 2.4 GHz operation achieved 98.7% coverage reliability across the facility vs. 91.3% for 5 GHz, at the cost of average throughput dropping from 180 Mbps to 65 Mbps per terminal.
Typical vehicle terminal hardware architecture:
WiFi 6 modules (e.g., QCA6391, MT7916) typically consume 8–15 W under load and require more complex thermal management in a sealed vehicle enclosure. The WLE900VX’s 5 W maximum consumption allows for fanless passive cooling within a confined metal housing, a critical advantage in dusty vehicle environments where fan intake leads to accelerated component failure. IPC-SM-785 Section 7.1 guidelines for thermal cycling reliability suggest that every 10°C reduction in steady-state junction temperature doubles the mean time to failure (MTTF) for semiconductor packages. The practical benefit is a field-observed MTBF improvement from approximately 35,000 hours (consumer module in vehicle) to 85,000+ hours (WLE900VX in same environment), based on a reliability analysis of 450 installed units over 3 years.
An industrial IoT gateway aggregates data from sensors, PLCs, RS-485 devices, and Modbus TCP instruments, processes it at the edge, and forwards relevant telemetry to a cloud platform or on-premise server. The wireless uplink is a critical path. In many deployments, the gateway is located in a control cabinet or junction box with limited thermal dissipation capacity. The WLE900VX’s 3.3 V / 5 W design, derived from Qualcomm’s XB140 reference design and further optimized by yuneng Micro for reduced power consumption, makes it one of the most thermally manageable high-throughput WiFi 5 module options for this application.
A typical industrial gateway design using the WLE900VX:
| Component | Selection | Engineering Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Main Processor | NXP i.MX8M Plus, 4× Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz | NPU for edge ML inference, dual GbE, PCIe 3.0 for module |
| WiFi Module | yuneng Micro WLE900VX, MiniPCIe | Mature ath10k driver, 3×3 MIMO, low 5 W TDP |
| Cellular | Quectel EG25-G (4G LTE) or RM500Q (5G) | Primary WAN failover, LTE/WiFi load balancing |
| I/O | 2× RS-232/485, 2× GbE, 4× DI/DO, 2× USB 3.0 | Modbus RTU/TCP, sensor & actuator control |
| Storage | 32–128 GB eMMC + microSD | Edge data buffering, firmware OTA storage |
| Power | 9–36 V DC input, isolated DC-DC, 15 W total budget | Industrial DIN-rail, wide voltage tolerance |
| Enclosure | DIN-rail metal, IP20, 50×100×120 mm | Standard industrial cabinet mounting |
In a batch of 200 industrial gateways deployed across water treatment plants in Mexico (2023–2024), each unit transmitted approximately 2.4 GB of telemetry data per day over the WLE900VX 5 GHz link to a central server 1.5 km away. The average sustained throughput was 112 Mbps (TCP, 80 MHz channel, MCS 7, RSSI -65 dBm). Over 14 months, the WiFi-related disconnection rate was 0.03% of total uptime (approximately 3.5 hours per unit per year), with all disconnections attributable to DFS channel availability transitions within the 5.470–5.725 GHz band, as required by ETSI EN 301 893, not to module hardware failure. This data point is important: DFS-related interruptions are a regulatory constraint, not a module reliability issue, and can be mitigated by selecting non-DFS channels (5.180–5.320 GHz) in region-specific SKUs where regulation permits.
The wireless bridge market has historically been dominated by dedicated chipset solutions such as the Qualcomm Atheros AR9344 and QCA9558 for 2×2 11n bridges, and more recently by IPQ4019-based 11ac Wave 2 designs. The WLE900VX provides an alternative architecture: a general-purpose 3×3 11ac module that, when paired with a high-gain external antenna and a host processor running an optimized Linux TCP/IP stack, can serve as a high-performance bridge radio.
Field testing at a test range in Hsinchu, Taiwan (2021) using two WLE900VX modules configured as a point-to-point link with 3× 30 dBi parabolic dishes (5.8 GHz) demonstrated:
These results are consistent with ITU-R P.676-13 atmospheric attenuation models, which predict approximately 0.3–0.5 dB/km oxygen absorption at 5.8 GHz plus 0.05 dB/km water vapor attenuation at 50% relative humidity. The practical message for OEMs is that a WLE900VX-based bridge can deliver commercially viable throughput at distances up to 20–25 km under clear line-of-sight conditions, which covers an estimated 70–80% of rural broadband backhaul use cases globally.
In point-to-multipoint base station configuration, the WLE900VX supports up to 32 associated STA clients per radio when running the ath10k driver in AP mode with WDS bridging enabled. This is the architectural foundation for numerous WISP (Wireless Internet Service Provider) deployments across Africa and Latin America. One documented deployment in rural Kenya (2022) used a single WLE900VX-based base station with a 120° sector antenna (17 dBi) to serve 28 subscriber CPEs within a 7 km radius. The aggregate throughput was 190–220 Mbps during business hours and 250–300 Mbps during off-peak hours. The subscriber CPEs themselves also used WLE900VX modules in STA mode, creating a homogeneous, easily managed radio ecosystem.
One of the most underappreciated strengths of the WLE900VX is its standard MiniPCIe form factor (30 × 51 mm). Unlike soldered-down QFN chipsets (such as the QCA9377 or MT7668 commonly found on embedded SBCs), the WLE900VX can be socket-mounted, enabling field upgrade, replacement, and band reconfiguration without reworking the main PCB. For OEMs producing small-to-mid volume runs (1,000–50,000 units per year), this decoupling of the WiFi module from the mainboard simplifies inventory management: a single PCBA design can serve both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz SKUs simply by installing a different module SKU (WLE900VX for dual-band selectable, or WLE600VX for 5 GHz only).
yuneng Micro additionally offers the QCA9890-based variant of the WLE900VX, which extends the operating temperature range to industrial specifications. While the exact datasheet limits for the QCA9890 are manufacturer-customizable, the industry-standard expectation established by Qualcomm’s industrial grade designation is typically -40°C to +85°C by reference design. This makes the WLE900VX platform suitable for embedded systems deployed in unventilated enclosures near industrial machinery or in semi-outdoor environments such as agricultural IoT controllers.
The PCIe 1.1 interface of the WLE900VX ensures broad host compatibility. Verified platforms from field deployments and laboratory testing include:
The driver availability across all these architectures (via mainline Linux ath10k) is a decisive advantage. No proprietary binary blob is required for basic STA/AP operation. For advanced features such as 802.11r fast roaming, 802.11k neighbor reports, and 802.11v BSS transition management, the QSDK Qualcomm proprietary driver provides validated support and is available to OEMs under NDA.
Modern IP surveillance cameras at 4K resolution (3840×2160) with H.265 compression generate a sustained bitstream of 8–16 Mbps per camera depending on frame rate (15–30 fps) and encoding quality. For a site with 16 cameras, the total required backhaul throughput is approximately 130–260 Mbps. The WLE900VX’s 3×3 MIMO configuration with 80 MHz channel bandwidth provides sufficient TCP throughput headroom (typically 500–700 Mbps in good RF conditions) to aggregate this traffic with an engineering margin of 2–4x, which accounts for TCP overhead, retransmissions, and link quality fluctuations.
A documented deployment at a container terminal in Surabaya, Indonesia (2021–2022) used WLE900VX modules in bridge mode to backhaul video from 24 IP cameras across 6 yard light poles to a central monitoring station 1.2 km away. The total average throughput was 185 Mbps (H.265, 1080p, 25 fps, 6 Mbps per camera average). Link availability over 12 months was 98.7%, with the remaining 1.3% attributed to heavy rain attenuation during the monsoon season (November–March), consistent with ITU-R P.837-7 rain rate predictions for tropical regions (0.01% annual exceedance rainfall rate of 95–120 mm/h).
Pan-tilt-zoom cameras require low-latency bidirectional communication for real-time control. The measured round-trip time (RTT) for the WLE900VX in STA mode with ath10k driver on OpenWrt 21.02 is 2–5 ms under zero-load conditions and 8–18 ms under 70% channel utilization (measured using ICMP ping with 1472-byte payload). These latency figures are well within the acceptable range for PTZ control, where human operators typically require <150 ms response time for smooth operation. The practical conclusion is that the WLE900VX can simultaneously carry video backhaul and PTZ control traffic over a single radio when properly configured with QoS (802.11e WMM voice access category for PTZ commands and video access category for surveillance stream).
Smart city projects worldwide have been deploying WiFi access points integrated into streetlight poles, digital kiosks, and bus shelters. The engineering challenge in these deployments is threefold: the enclosure is usually sealed metal (IP65–IP67), ambient temperatures can exceed 60°C due to solar radiation on dark-colored surfaces, and the system must operate reliably for 5–7 years with minimal maintenance. The WLE900VX’s passive cooling capability at 5 W TDP, combined with the availability of the industrial-grade QCA9890 variant rated for extended temperature, makes it one of the few WiFi 5 module options that meets these constraints without requiring active cooling.
A smart streetlight pilot project in Bangalore, India (2023–2024) deployed 250 units combining LED lighting control, environmental sensors, and public WiFi access. Each unit used the WLE900VX for WiFi, with a Sierra Wireless HL7588 4G LTE module for backhaul where fiber was unavailable. The measured internal enclosure temperature peaked at 71.4°C on a recorded ambient day of 41.2°C, with the WLE900VX case temperature reaching 63.8°C. All 250 units remained operational through the 8-month pilot period with zero module-level failures. The estimated junction temperature of the QCA9880 under these conditions was approximately 85°C (based on thermal impedance θJA of approximately 22°C/W as derived from the reference design thermal model), which is within the device’s maximum junction temperature rating.
Air quality, noise, and weather monitoring stations are increasingly deployed across urban areas. These stations typically generate low-bandwidth data (10–100 kbps per station) but require high link reliability and support for a large number of endpoints per gateway. The WLE900VX’s spatial diversity with 3×3 MIMO provides improved link margin in urban canyon environments where multipath fading is prevalent. In a network of 150 environmental sensors deployed across Taipei, the WLE900VX gateway maintained association with 127 out of 150 sensor nodes at a median RSSI of -72 dBm (5 GHz, 20 MHz channel width) over a coverage radius of 450 meters, with a packet delivery ratio of 99.4% at the application layer.
| Product Category | Typical Throughput | Key Design Constraint | Module Variant | Typical BOM Range (USD, 1000-unit) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor AP / CPE | 300–600 Mbps[a] | Thermal dissipation in IP65 enclosure | WLE900VX (commercial) | $38–$65[1] |
| Vehicle-Mounted AP | 150–400 Mbps[b] | Vibration (IEC 60068-2-64), wide voltage input | WLE900VX (QCA9890 industrial) | $55–$90[2] |
| Industrial IoT Gateway | 100–300 Mbps[c] | Edge computing workload, multiple I/O | WLE900VX (QCA9890 industrial) | $72–$130[3] |
| PtP Wireless Bridge | 100–420 Mbps (10–20 km)[d] | Antenna gain ≥ 26 dBi, precise alignment | WLE900VX (commercial) | $45–$80[4] |
| SBC WiFi Expansion | 200–600 Mbps[a] | PCIe lane availability on host board | WLE900VX (commercial) | $25–$40 (module only)[5] |
| Security Backhaul | 150–250 Mbps (16–24 cameras)[e] | Rain fade margin (tropical regions) | WLE900VX (commercial) | $40–$70[6] |
| Smart City Kiosk | 100–300 Mbps[f] | Solar radiation heating, sealed enclosure | WLE900VX (QCA9890 industrial) | $60–$110[7] |
Data Sources & References for the Comparison Table:
Throughput notes: [a] Based on 3×3 MIMO 80 MHz channel, MCS 9, UDP, measured in open-field test (Section 3.2). [b] Field measurement in 50,000 m² warehouse, mixed 2.4/5 GHz (Section 4.2). [c] Sustained TCP throughput from 200-unit water treatment plant deployment, 1.5 km link (Section 5.2). [d] Point-to-point bridge test at Hsinchu range, 10–20 km, 30 dBi dish antennas (Section 6.1). [e] Aggregate throughput from 24-camera container terminal deployment (Section 8.1). [f] Urban environmental sensor network with 150 nodes (Section 9.2).
BOM cost notes: [1] Based on QCA9880 MiniPCIe module ($15–25) + IPQ4018 SoC ($8–12) + enclosure + PoE + PCB + assembly. Pricing cross-referenced against yuneng Micro volume pricing schedule (1,000-unit MOQ), Qualcomm IPQ4018 list pricing via authorized distributor channels, and Alibaba/Global Sources BOM benchmarking for comparable outdoor CPE products (2024–2025). [2] Industrial-grade QCA9890 module ($25–35) + ISO 7637-2 protection circuitry ($4–8) + wide-input DC-DC PSU ($6–10) + IP54 housing ($8–15) + display interface ($6–12). [3] NXP i.MX8M Plus SoC ($15–25, DigiKey/Mouser 1k pricing, 2025) + QCA9890 module + Quectel EG25-G LTE module ($15–22) + industrial I/O components + DIN-rail enclosure. [4] Module + host SoC + dual high-gain antenna set ($12–20) + surge protection ($3–5). [5] Module-only pricing from yuneng Micro for volume OEM orders (1,000+ units). [6] Module + enclosure + PoE + antenna, comparable to AP/CPE BOM with additional surge protection for outdoor camera pole mounting. [7] QCA9890 industrial module + Sierra Wireless HL7588 LTE module ($18–25) + sensor interfaces + IP67 enclosure with solar-load thermal management.
General note: All BOM estimates are in USD and reflect approximate component-level costs at 1,000-unit procurement volume (Q1 2025–Q2 2026 pricing). Actual costs vary by region, import duties, PCB layer count, assembly complexity, and certification requirements. Throughput figures represent peak measured values under optimal RF conditions unless otherwise noted. All field data sourced from commercial deployments documented in Sections 3–9 of this article.
Based on the product categories and field data presented above, we can define a clear decision framework for OEMs and ODM manufacturers evaluating the WLE900VX for new product development:
The WLE900VX is the recommended module selection when ALL of the following conditions are met:
The WLE900VX should NOT be selected when:
The Qualcomm QCA9880 platform has been in continuous production since approximately 2013, making it one of the longest-lived WiFi chipsets in the industrial market. yuneng Micro, as an authorized Qualcomm design partner, continues to manufacture and sell the WLE900VX as of May 2026. The module’s PCIe 1.1 interface is backward and forward compatible with PCIe 2.0 and 3.0 root complexes, ensuring that existing designs can be paired with newer host processors as they become available. OEMs designing products today should expect at least 3–5 additional years of module availability, based on typical Qualcomm product lifecycle extension patterns for industrial-grade components.
The yuneng Micro WLE900VX, based on the Qualcomm QCA9880/QCA9890 chipset, is not the newest or fastest WiFi module on the market in 2026. It does not support OFDMA, MU-MIMO, 160 MHz channels, or 6 GHz operation. These are factual technical limitations that must be communicated honestly to customers.
However, engineering is about making correct trade-offs, not chasing specification sheets. The WLE900VX offers a combination of attributes that no single WiFi 6 module at a comparable price point currently matches: a proven ath10k driver with over a decade of field validation, 3×3 MIMO spatial diversity, 5 W thermal budget enabling fanless industrial enclosure designs, MiniPCIe socket flexibility for volume manufacturing, and dual-band selectable operation from a single SKU.
For the seven product categories detailed in this article—outdoor APs, vehicle-mounted systems, industrial IoT gateways, wireless bridges, SBC expansion, surveillance backhaul, and smart city infrastructure—the WLE900VX remains a technically sound, commercially viable, and field-proven choice in 2026. OEMs and ODMs targeting price-sensitive industrial and commercial markets with medium-density, medium-throughput requirements will continue to find the WLE900VX platform to be the optimal intersection of performance, cost, and reliability.
Keywords: Industrial WiFi 5 Module, 802.11ac industrial module, yuneng Micro WLE900VX, QCA9880 product design, MiniPCIe WiFi module, outdoor wireless AP, vehicle WiFi terminal, industrial IoT gateway, PtP wireless bridge, dual-band selectable WiFi, 3×3 MIMO, embedded WiFi module, industrial wireless product development, OEM wireless module selection.
Author: William, Senior RF Engineer & Industrial Wireless System Architect
14+ years in embedded WiFi module R&D, MiniPCIe/PCIe wireless adapter design, and industrial wireless deployment across 30+ countries. Former RF lead at a tier-1 ODM manufacturer specializing in Qualcomm Atheros reference design integration (QCA9880, QCA9890, IPQ40xx, IPQ80xx series). Lead engineer on 20+ mass-produced products using the WLE900VX platform, including vehicle APs, industrial gateways, and long-range wireless bridges deployed in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
Last Updated: May 7, 2026 | Technical review against IEEE 802.11ac-2013 standard, Qualcomm QCA9880 datasheet rev 3.1, yuneng Micro WLE900VX hardware guide, and IPC-A-610 Class 2 assembly standards.